• Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    youre only looking it in the POV of a non pet owner. in a perspective of a pet owner that would increase the supply of houses because their initial choices were already (artificially) limited. again it only increases the prices of other houses because of more competition to rent, but in the pet owners perspective, it lowers it because the supply itself rapidly grew.

    • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Who gives a fuck about a pet owner’s perspective? Owning pets is a choice. Existing in the society we’re born to is not a choice. So, if you can’t afford the increased cost of pet ownership, you’re not entitled to increase the costs for everyone else to accommodate your main character syndrome. Why are pet owners so goddamn entitled and fucking insufferable?

      • margaritox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Actually I’ve noticed that it’s the no-pet Karens/Kevins who sound entitled and insufferable.

        • Letstakealook@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          How am I entitled? I’m not the one expecting to disrupt the peace of others where they live and increase the living costs of others because I just have to have a fucking dog in an apartment.