• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    He said he wanted to be a Dictator on Day 1. How many dictators have you ever heard of that gave up power? The American Experiment (executive leaders peacefully giving up power) was such a unique thing because it’s so unheard of. Also fitting that Trump ended that tradition on Jan 06.

    If Trump or any Republican gets elected again, expect the end of our democracy and the start of the fascist dictatorship. I wish I could convey how absolutely literal I’m being.

    • Muehe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      How many dictators have you ever heard of that gave up power?

      I get what you are saying and agree, but it is kind of noteworthy that basically every dictator before Caesar did that. Famously there was some retired consul or something in the early republic who was granted the dictatorship, saved Rome from seemingly assured destruction in combat, and then immediately retired back to his farm. Always forget the name… But even people like Sulla, who used his dictatorship to wage a civil war and is to my knowledge the first Roman general to march troops into Rome, eventually resigned their dictatorship. It was originally never intended to be a permanent position, which is why Caesar claiming it for life was such a turn of an era.

      I guess what I’m saying overall is Trump might, even if elected to a second term, still turn out to be the American Sulla instead of the American Caesar if you catch my drift.

      Disclaimer: Non-American here. Dictatorship bad. All of this is bad.

      • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Cincinnatus. That was the hero one-battle dictator who went back to his farm after.

        I don’t know the history well enough to know how common it was or how real the story is to the way things played out. But I always sort of suspected that the Cincinnatus story was played up so much that we still know it thousands of years later, because of later Roman dictators who really wanted to plant it in the public imagination that benevolent dictators were real, and a totally excellent idea

        • Muehe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Cincinnatus.

          Yes, thank you!

          Yeah I guess it is quite possible, likely even, that his story was embellished in history, and it was certainly abused later as you say. But to my layperson’s knowledge at least, every instance of historically recorded dictatorship before Caesar was relinquished willingly. I also think it quite possible that for a long time there was enough social pressure around such an office to keep it temporary, especially if it was indeed mainly directed against external threats like invasions.

          My interpretation is that Sulla set a bad precedent for abuse of the office in domestic politics, Caesar used that precedent to try and kill the (senatorial) republic, and Augustus dealt the finishing blow.

          But all of this is an etymological tangent in answer to a rhetorical question anyway. With the drift in meaning Trump basically said he wants to be king, and he might still get his second opportunity to be become Caesar.

      • Impassionata@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        you should shut the fuck up with your ‘well actually’ de facto dictator apologia

        Rome didn’t have that many ‘dictators’ give up power

        the vast majority of societies with authoritarian dictators are dysfunctional

        again: shut the fuck up.

            • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              “Hey this historical fact is both relevant and interesting”

              “STOP APOLOGIZING FOR THE BAD MEN”

                • YeetPics@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  You sound so mad, and all this projection about being an idiot isn’t the healthy outlet for that self-doubt you may think it is.

                  Go outside sometime, feel the sun, touch the grass.

                  It’s nice out there, buddy 😎

                  • Impassionata@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    These are not problems I have. I do have the problem of pseudofascist apologia being literally everywhere. You emitted trash nonsense. We already know what Trump is. Shut the fuck up.

        • Muehe@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Wow, ok. User name does not check out.

          Jokes aside though I feel attacked and my defence mechanism is to braindump, so consider what is to follow to be on you.

          you should shut the fuck up with your ‘well actually’ de facto dictator apologia

          As I was trying to make clear with the implicit disclaimer at the beginning of my comment and the explicit disclaimer at the end of my comment, that was not my intention. What I was trying to do was expand on the historical context as @Soulg@sh.itjust.works already pointed out (thanks btw). I am well aware that the term dictator has lost its connotation of “temporary office” long ago, and it is today used pretty much in the sense of absolute monarchy.

          Rome didn’t have that many ‘dictators’ give up power

          The GP asked “how many do you know”, and essentially I replied “at least two but pretty sure it’s more” to that.

          But ok, you posit I test. Here is my counterargument. With knowing Wikipedias love for lists and a search you land here: List of Roman dictators.

          List starts 501 BCE, ends 44 BCE, with Julius Caesar by the way. I would eyeball its length at ~80-100 entries. That would amount to a dictatorship once every five years roughly.

          The article helpfully explains a few Latin terms it uses, among them “abdicavit – abdicated, or resigned”. Ctrl+F says 7 occurrences, minus the one explaining it that are 6 mentions of the term, so my new guesstimate would be there are at least 6 dictators (in ancient Rome) who relinquished their office willingly. And I would bet you could get that number higher if you dig into the details, and start looking at term limits and stuff.

          So all I’m saying is essentially the dictatorship was an office that was regularly employed for nearly 500 years by an ancient state, and was then abused to bring about the destruction of its system of government. Remind you of anything? Like the presidency? Trump?

          the vast majority of societies with authoritarian dictators are dysfunctional

          Like those that exist right now? Not only the vast majority, all of them are dysfunctional and I never doubted that. Seriously you are preaching to the choir here. I was literally at court today because a number on a piece of paper was too low, and I couldn’t pay to get a newer piece of paper. Luckily the case was dismissed, so I’m pretty fond of the rule of law and separation of powers at the moment, but also equally aware of the monopoly on violence the state claims for itself and how fragile that makes it.

          I sense that you are angry, and most likely afraid, and I empathise with that. And due to that level of distress I would assume you are from the US. I’m not sure what to tell you except trying to resist the slide into dictatorship the best you can. Caesar was assassinated, and Hitler only narrowly escaped assassination several times is all I’m saying.

          again: shut the fuck up.

          Yeah, no, you little dictator. :P

          • Impassionata@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I guess what I’m saying overall is Trump might, even if elected to a second term, still turn out to be the American Sulla instead of the American Caesar if you catch my drift.

            This is stupid. You are an idiot. Shut the fuck up.

            • Muehe@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              I’m not quite sure what exactly you are taking offence from in that statement but feel free to enlighten me. In my defence I tried to indicate that it is a rough metaphor.

              P.S. to rephrase, it seems you did not in fact catch my drift.

              • Impassionata@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                If Trump is elected to a second term it will be a disaster and there is no ambiguity as to the nature of Trump for he has already declared civil war against the will of the American people. You are an idiot.

                • Muehe@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  If Trump is elected to a second term it will be a disaster and there is no ambiguity as to the nature of Trump for he has already declared civil war against the will of the American people.

                  And please show me where the fuck I ever doubted that. Do you not know who Sulla was? Did you not read me saying he fought a civil war and was the first general to march on Rome? Like right above the section you quoted out of context?

                  What I said is Trump might not turn out to be the one to kill the republic but the one to irreparably damage it instead. Think for example him getting elected to a second term and then dying a month into it without achieving much of his dictatorial agenda.

                  You are an idiot.

                  That I am, given that I am still arguing with you.