Really you don’t need to read more than one chart:

If you vote for anyone other than Harris, you’re voting for Trump:

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    In both cases the outcome was overwhelmingly a result of Republican obstructionism with the vast majority who voted to support DC Statehood being Democrat. There is no reason Democrats wouldn’t want another state that would be the bluest in the country to statehood lol. Democrats had a filibuster-proof super-majority for like, two months, and if you recall that kind of had other things going on at the time in 2009—including but not limited to health care reform and recession recovery.

    In 2017… You know who was President and who controlled the Senate, right…?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      In both cases the outcome was overwhelmingly a result of Republican obstructionism

      Democrats claiming they need 60 votes to do anything are as big a pack of liars as Republicans claiming Unitary Executive is a thing.

      These are institutions that are hostile to a majority black state.

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        They did and they do. Especially for partisan policies.

        Show me the Republican Senators in 2017 willing to support DC statehood that would get it across the finish line.

        These are institutions that are hostile to a majority black state.

        Major Citation need for an extraordinary claim. Where is your proof Democrats of today whose presidential nominee is black is trying to stop this? Lmao?

        How is DC statehood bad for Dems? Lol.