• Yabai@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The practicality isn’t questionable.

    Of course there are outliers and places/people it wouldn’t work for but the vast majority should be absolutely fine.

    • Hirom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Even if it’s not practical right away, that’s just a reason to vote to put people in charge who would make it practical and convenient.

      It’s also possible to join a non-profit that engage with the public and local governments to make bicycle-friendly infrastructure happen.

      • derelict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not only vote, but get involved in local politics. A lot of transportation and zoning issues have real things happening at the local levels where a single individual can make a difference

    • rigo@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      It is questionable though in most states in the US atleast. Not sure how someone who lives a 20 minute drive from the nearest town in the middle of nowhere is supposed to ride a bike around. The whole world isn’t urbanized

      • Yabai@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        You’re right that currently it’s hard many places in the US thanks to suburbs, terrible zoning, car focused laws and so on.
        But it’s not like biking itself is the issue here, it’s that you are in dire need of better infrastructure, zoning, public transport and laws.

        • rigo@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Again this is semantics. But this isn’t true. Look at the entire state of WV or any state that is mountainous. Unless magically millions of people get in much better shape there isn’t an obvious solution. I’m all for better infrastructure and public transport.

          • newde@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            As long as all the urban areas in the US are unfriendly to bikes, it is a completely valid point. Not semantics. We are talking about 80% of the population who could be biking, but aren’t do to terrible policies.

        • rigo@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yep, I’m not debating that point. I’m 100% in favor of doing that. I’m asking about solutions for everyone else. This debate is usually framed as “all we need to do is” when that isn’t the case for everywhere or everyone. Just diving into it a little bit more.

          • anji@lemmy.anji.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah a solution for the remaining 20% would be great, but we (the US) are not even addressing the urban 80%. I live in the SF Bay Area. It’s incredibly dense here, yet riding a bike is impossible/suicidal. It takes me 20 minutes to get to work by car, but 2 hours by bus. This needs to be fixed first before worrying about small town Montana.

            • rigo@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yep yep, again. Agreed on all counts but that isn’t what the original comments or the article was about. Which is why I brought it up in the first place. I think it’s generally agreed that the more urbanized places would need revamping first. I’m just specifically asking about ideas in rural areas because that’s where I’m from.

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Then different solutions can be put in place in these places and/or you start with cities and figure out the country side later.

        I think the bigger issue you have in the US is the sprawled neighbourhoods, I’m not sure how you can get back from that, maybe recreate small centers in the middle of them.

        • rigo@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          What are the different solutions? Genuinely asking. Seems like a large aspect to skip since it represents the majority of the US LOL

          • trident_burger@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Provide regularly scheduled public transportation that feeds into denser urban areas. Make it easy to bike in denser urban areas.

            • rigo@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              So to provide regularly scheduled public transportation we would need to build out rail infrastructure to country areas? I suppose a park and ride system would be effective but what would still require a mass buildout.

              I’m thinking of areas like this one I attached. The nearest cities are 1hr drive from most towns, the cities are all small-midsized so don’t have that many jobs (proportionally) in the first place. The solution is to put train stations in every town? Every other town? Then the cities themselves would need to build out rail infrastructure because Albany and Syracuse have very little in the way of public transportation.

              Genuinely asking, not trying to come across as snarky. This is actually a middle-ground example. I could show you a map of WV or Western PA if you really want to see rural.

              • trident_burger@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                I mean…yes? Absolutely, improve rail infrastructure in Albany and Syracuse. Build park and rides at places that feed into that improved system. Improve bus service (or train? Looks like there are already tracks in many places) along higway corridors with moderately sized communities.

                Can counties or cities currently afford this without sacrificing something? No.

                Would the federal government and states need to spend hundreds of billions, if not trillions, over several decades to make happen? Yes.

                • rigo@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Yeah the track system is largely in place (not sure if freight or passenger). I’m not trying to argue lol. I’m just asking questions. So in your world there would be a mass spiderweb of intersecting trains that sprawls out to everywhere (obviously a kind of park and ride situation) and that would feed into the cities or other communities.

                  Makes me think about the whole idea of the Green New Deal that Sanders was talking about when he ran the first time. Get a giant workforce of people out there building railways and stations. Would be interesting to see for sure.