• AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      Because a lot of the “Democrats are pro genocide” crew seem to be Stein stans. Maybe he’s not, but the point was that there are two possible outcomes of the election in November and saying “I can’t vote for someone who’s pro-genocide” is a bullshit copout.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        24 days ago

        It really is considering one is merely twiddling their thumbs as Palestine burns, the option that isn’t Harris aspires to be literally Hitler.

        Ya think if you gave a shit about genocide you’d, I dunno… Not want to risk “Literally Hitler” getting into power?

        • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          24 days ago

          Genocide occurs with either one. Get a clue. If you dont like it, tell your reps and stfu about peoples voting decisions. Its not your place to judge their decisions with their votes.

          If harris loses because of her support for genocide thats on her for not reading the room in two of only 5 states that matter.

          Sucks to be her and the Democrats but thems the breaks when your partisan and incapable of doing the right thing

    • Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      24 days ago

      They think any anti-harries statement is Pro Russia and Pro Trump and calls for Stein vote.

      I am not a US citizen, and the US foreign policy never change between the two parties and I will never advocate or try to tell people who to vote for.

      • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        the US foreign policy never change between the two parties

        This is such a reductionist take on an incredibly broad and complex topic that I have to wonder whether you’re joking.