• Most tipped workers already don’t pay federal taxes.
  • Increasing the tipped minimum would do more.

Edit: really there should be no minimum lower than the hourly minimum.

  • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It being a bad idea makes it a bad idea though. Why would this source of income be exempt from taxation? Why is that a good idea? Why is a salaried or hourly employee less deserving of having their income exempted?

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Why should it be taxed? Not “Why it shouldn’t”.

      Imo, income tax should only affect the rich, and they aren’t working tipped jobs.

      • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Why should it be taxed? Not “Why it shouldn’t”.

        Because income is taxed. We have a progressive tax system, so the first small amount is untaxed, the next is taxed at a low rate, the next is taxed at a slightly higher rate, and so on through the tax brackets.

        You’re now saying that salary and hourly employees wages should be taxed, but not tipped income. So my question remains, why shouldn’t it be taxed? Why create an inequity between different sources of income.

        Imo, income tax should only affect the rich, and they aren’t working tipped jobs.

        Not taxing tipped income doesn’t achieve your stated goal. The majority of low and middle income wage earners are still taxed. Altering the tax brackets would be more fair, and come closer to achieving your stated goal. Exempting tips remains a terrible idea.