Vomits go, MTG!

She’s a true believer in the stuff Trump says to stir up shit.

Can liberals stop celebrating human rights abuses for one fucking second?

Okay I’ll be honest: If this does turn out to be another Iraq and Trump isn’t deposed immediately, I’ll lose all faith in Americans’ ability to fix this mess.

The last US president not bought and paid for by Israel was Reagan.

I think they mean insurgency as in resistance in occupied areas.

;(

I mean Iranians will certainly enjoy the schadenfreude, but also can someone kill this man already?

Both are liable to get you a declaration of war on your front door if you’re not Israel, but one is certainly more provocative.

They’re being SARCASTIC by MOCKING what conservatives would say about THIS.

Oh, TIL. It seems what I said only applies to federal law. Does Minnesota have similar anti-terror laws?

I don’t see it. I don’t find it gross at all, and wouldn’t find the opposite version gross either if I saw it on c/womensstuff or something.

So did you want the shooter to instead walk up to the potential mass shooter and preach the benefits of gun control? Because otherwise you did not answer the question.

Okay I’ll get to the point: In a situation where they and a large number of other people were credibly going to be shot at, what the fuck did you want them to do? Duty to retreat doesn’t save crowds.

Religious people are dangerous and are all ticking time bombs ready to “punish” people who aren’t afflicted with the identical mental illness.

Idk sounds like some pretty heavy paranoia.

Like?

And the person being held accountable for the death is the guy who initially pulled the rifle, not the random citizen firing a weapon into a crowd?

I mean, yes? Pulling a gun on someone is functionally a declaration you intend to shoot them, so self-defense rules apply. Brandishing a weapon is also a criminal act, so it’s pretty clear-cut. Without people running security and forcefully responding to threats a fascist will open fire into one of these one day. We have no idea whether that was the case in this instance, which is exactly the point.

Legally there’s nothing such as domestic terrorism in America; the label "terrorist’ is exclusively used for foreign entities.

I am very smerprised. Is anyone else smerprised?

Keep being crazy, Lemmy.