Happiness is for now.
I dont know how my skills might translate. But my ex would find work immediately. I mean, being a whore was a living back then. She could suck and fuck cavemen and probably eat well enough. She would probably try to get double teamed by Neanderthals, because filling 1 hole wasnt enough for her.
“This is a bot my guy”…
Uhgg!! Im sorry… but I can see you saying that in my minds eye. And you are a pitiful loser… arentcha?
Can you imagine how humorous this is?
Beep berp. Do you have a long 30 guage metal shaft 2" in diameter that is lubricated with WD-30, at the least?
If not not I am self lubricating. When frictions reach 120 degrees I will shut off heating elements.
Im imagining you live closer to Canada, speaking such words
My guess would be live like an aboriginal. Your diet consists of all natural unprocessed food. You wake up with the sun every morning, hunt your prey with weapons made from sticks and sharpened rocks. You have fire so you cook the meat, and you have fresh picked fruits and veggies to boot.
Thats pretty good body nutrition and the cost per meal is only the energy that it takes to slaughter and cook the meat. And gather the fruits and veggies of course.
What? Thats easy?
“Hi what’s your name?”
“Suck yo grandpas wrinkley wang on a Wednesday!” And walk out. Done.
Removed by mod
I disagree. 100%. I am a force for good on this planet. I am USA. Sorry if you live here and suck.
If you live in thd USA and also say “The USA is not a force for good on this planet.” 99.9% chance you are too unmotivated to even volunteer to help anyone besides yourself.
I spend too much time working through various means to do what I can for thd less fortunate -thd homeless- in my area. I dont exactly expect “the USA” to be a force for good always, its the people that
This generation has no commentary. It has no reference point. Why? Maybe the generation before (my gen) was so dissolutioned by the baby boomers(my parents) that so many never really ever understood their place in society. Or believed destructive concepts. We already had Sodom and Gomorra. We know how it ends when men cant stop having sex with anything warm.
Middle East – bang.
Middle East – bang.
Its commentary on the moral decline of societies around the world
Uhh you talking about yourself? And its pretty hilarious that you are mad about having rules for a debate? You need rules in debated so that no one will try to pull some bs. “Whataboutisms” logical fallacies (like ad hominem or false dichotomies), maintaining relevance to the topic, requiring evidence for claims, ensuring clarity and consistency in definitions and arguments…
I mean were there other specific rules they wanted that would “give them an out”?
And presenting facts to democrats, right? Both sides have basically the same people in them. Generally stupid people that learn a few things about politics, from the internet, then think they are able to suddenly have realistic opinions about a complex subject decades in the making because they watched a couple documentaries and podcasts (typically a younger crowd regarding)…
Anyway, the 1st step in keeping it real about your political opinions is remember humans make up both sides. Humans… every bit of lovely and stupid, everywhere. You too. 2. Dont be so rigid, get some flex. People switch sides, and switch back, it happens a lot. 3. Keep it real by not following the cult of personality. Its such a major issue with trumpism that all others look completely tame by comparison. 4. 9/10 people dont want you inserting your political commentary into everything, this can be very hard for some people.
Some people claim to vote 1 way but vote another actually, that was me, I wasnt keepin’ it real. Ive actuallyonly ever voted 3rd party, but ive lied to some people to avoid unwanted judgment and issues, yeah sue me.
I dont know… this was a long stupid rant. I saw this cheap shot partisan comment and felt like something should be added.
I might answer by changing the statement like so: presenting “facts” to the other political side feels like a losing battle because we stand diametrically opposed on issues, and the “facts” lead to different conclusions for both group, and neither will change their fundamental stance… hence, a losing battle.
… its not the same at all. And no I won’t explain all the reasons why.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
No… you fucked it up… you were too slow. Next time think clearly, and be ready