why is one of the very few people who could possibly lose to that disastrous GOP clown show allowed to speak about anything still‽

technological advancement is supposed to be for the better. chatgpt is not advancement.

literally every time I gave one of these things a shot they gave me at least one blatantly wrong answer. considering by how animated you got from the get go about the mere idea of having it shut down, you’re probably not the type that would notice.

isn’t interpreting language the ONE thing LLMs are supposed to be good at? jesus

yeah, but on the other hand, he fucked up the entire reduction system in the US.

that’s the sound of player two inserting coin

yeah you could delete the labels altogether and I’d still tell you which color is which vote based on who voted.

for future reference, if you see the US voting with the wartorn, economically devastated, despot-ruled or otherwise suffering nations, or if you see the US voting alone or with Israel, then you can bet that they voted for the worst option.

yeah but it has to be given with a silhouette of the others with it, whereas the other layout allows them to be recognizable on their own.

button prompts can be recognizable by silhouette

it’s hearsay; if you can’t cross examine the testimony, it can’t be presented as evidence.

great; now hegseth can finally finish his chest tattoo

This what happens when fucking weirdos who have never talked to other people are in charge of tech. they come up with something that can’t talk like a person and is always wrong and they are super impressed with it because it’s the closest they come to socializing.

how many outages does this make now… this is the internet now. a couple companies hold the services for the entire internet and if they have an issue it’s basically the before times.

in case some people don’t know: algebra actually comes from the Arabic word “al-jabr”.

no. boneless means without bones. there’s no “acceptable risk” when the package says there’s no risk.

this should be grounds for a prison sentence. open support for Nazism shouldn’t be covered by free speech laws.

oh my god. i didn’t ask about polling. i said they came out on top of of what, and you said polling. and i said what the fuck is that going to do, not “what is polling can you explain”

that’s not an answer. you can’t say what you they’re getting out of this because the answer is fuck-all. oh yeah, “political strategy” from the party that snatches defeat from the jaws of victory all the fucking time, that’s reassuring…

and what’s polling gonna do for them now?

on top of what? they got nothing out of this.