• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Immigration is such a horseshit issue. Why are people dumb enough to fall for this shit?

    Immigration will be “solved” come January, but not because Trump will actually do anything about it, but he’ll just say the problem is solved and then stop talking about it.

    • djsoren19@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Because the Democrats picked it up and used it as an issue as well. Instead of dispelling the myths of “Bigrant Crime,” as if that would be a challenge, they took an anti-immigration stance as well. Honestly, Trump had a rare master class attack on the Dems with the whole “they’ve been in power for four years, why haven’t they already done everything,” because it called out just how shallow the Dems bending to conservative anti-immigrant policy was. It was almost certainly an accident on his part, especially since his party was the reason Dems couldn’t be as hard on immigration as they wanted, but it turned into effective messaging.

  • anticurrent@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You don’t win an election just with vibes.

    Kamala didn’t bring as much substance as what the left electorate was expecting from her, and couldn’t differentiate herself from Biden and the current term she is serving under. The whole democratic party went under because all they promise is vibes compared the current economical struggles people are facing.

    • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I was onboard with her but I honestly felt icky every time the Biden administration released a new statement about how good the economy is. How out of touch do you have to be to think the economy is good? Republicans have no intention of fixing that but at least they’re smart enough to see that people feel crushed in this economy and pander to it. And apparently that was a much bigger issue than abortion, which shocked me at first but as it settles I see that my fear as a woman pales in comparison to America’s fear of a woman and America’s struggling financial situation.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        How out of touch do you have to be to think the economy is good?

        Liberals measure the health of the economy by Gross Domestic Product (which has been going up), and Consumer Price Index (which includes big-screen TVs). You’d have to dismantle everything they paid to learn in college econ.

        “It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

    • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The truth is the dems are a right wing party now, they’ve been dragged there by the rethugs… and people Want to vote for an Actual left wing party, but there literally isnt one in the US.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The poison of the “big tent”. Move a little over to let people in enough and you are no longer representing anyone in a desperate attempt to represent everyone.

        • djsoren19@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          between this and the enshittification of big tech and gaming, it feels like 2024 has been one big argument in support of gatekeeping.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Or you know, not gatekeeping but actually taking a position as a political party (instead of trying to be some grey nothing). Oh and having more then two parties would be nice.

      • pound_heap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I don’t think people want to vote for a party. People want to vote for someone who’s making sense for them, and looks like for majority it was Trump this time.

        An “actual left wing party” must not only have ideology, but a sound plan on how to improve people’s lives and an ability to communicate this plan to people, loud and clear. Actually, as populists are now trusted everywhere in the world, the plan is less important than communication

        • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 hours ago

          trumps ‘road to prosperity’ is tariffs… which will lead to a depression, maybe a global one. Thats a helluva plan there

          • lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I didn’t read that as OP saying they believed that will work, I read it as saying the majority of Americans (or at least the majority of Americans who bothered voting) believed that.

  • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Economy

    This is Trump’s economy, you idiots. This is the fallout from his incompetence and malice. But heaven forbid voters understand basic principles which rule their lives.

    • kava@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      11 hours ago

      i think you give too much credit to Trump. the economy has been rigged against the working class for a long time. it’s just getting progressively more brutal which makes people feel increasingly insecure.

      an insecure working class elects strongmen who promise simple solutions

      • RobotsLeftHand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The best, simplest summation I’ve seen. Thank you. I’ve been searching for something to make sense of it and this is definitely it. Being forced into voting for the “least worst” candidate obscures where that path is headed by either candidate.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s the pattern in American politics that has existed since I was born: Republicans fuck the economy, Democrats do their best to fix it, people blame the Democrats for the bad economy and elect Republicans who fuck it up even more.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      No, sorry, but you don’t get to say that four years later.

      The economy got trashed in his last year… but remember how the sparse economic relief that were carried through the democratic congress got completely wiped out as soon as Biden took office? When the democrats took away the child tax credit childhood poverty doubled overnight. And you may say the cause of the inflation was Trump’s mismanagement (And it wasn’t. The supply chain breakdown would have happened no matter who was in office.) what was the democratic response? Fucking Chicago school.

      What’s happening is the US empire is not so slowly rotting and material conditions are deteriorating. That’s independent of what party is in power. But both parties are wedded to capital. And voters are hopping from one foot to the other while standing on that hot skillet trying to find relief. You’re not going to find it without overthrowing capitalism. This is the barbarism we were warning you about.

      • kava@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And it wasn’t. The supply chain breakdown would have happened no matter who was in office

        if i remember correctly, COVID brought our inflation up to roughly 6%. then the Ukrainian war took it the rest of way where it peaked near 9% (over 10% in my home state)

        these things would have happened anyway, although choosing to prolong the Ukrainian war as long as possible most definitely increased inflation. people think we only gave 2 or 3 hundred billion, but realistically the American public has paid more than a trillion in the invisible tax that is inflation. hundreds of thousands of layoffs because of higher interest rates are also connected to this

        • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Let’s not forget that a large part of the inflation, and especially on food and housing, was driven by pure greed and opportunism from the capitalists that control those basic necessities. And that’s something that could have been prevented with tools that capital permitted under Ronald Fucking Reagan.

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            it’s an eternal battle. every once in a while we pass legislation to try and reign in corporate power. like for example the anti trust act in the early 1900s

            the issue is that public attention is temporary. eventually we move on to the next crisis and people forget. grow complacent.

            corporate interest, however, is eternal. it’s persistent and never gives up. it keeps pushing, infallibly, in order to weaken the structures meant to reign in their power. whether by legislation/policy (AT&T and friends unilaterally killing Net Neutrality some years back, Disney signing into law expansion of copyright, etc) or through more subtle methods (buying politicians and getting people into positions of power that have no intention of enforcing the laws)

            this is inevitably what happens with every democracy. eventually the vigilance fails and the structures of power are hijacked by opportunists.

            although having said all that, I don’t think greed had much to do with the inflation we saw. Sure, some companies took advantage and raised prices more than they needed to just to inflate that extra juicy profit margin.

            but realistically we’re headed to war and war means massive government spending which means inflation

            • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              You’re separating government from the capitalists and I don’t think that’s an accurate way of looking at the world. Capital will eat itself even more voraciously than it does right now without some mediating force on itself. Government isn’t a hedge against capitalism that mediates its excesses. It is a PART of capitalism that mediates its excesses. The anti-trust act wasn’t for us; it was for them.

              But the reality that capitalism is a fundamentally unstable system can’t be fixed by blunting it. And as the rate of profit goes down, the very restraints that capital put on itself to ensure its survival must be destroyed in pursuit of that profit.

              • kava@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                i think most legislation is explicitly for the capitalist class. that much we probably agree with

                but i do think every once in a while, when there is a ton of pressure and the elites are scared, they throw a bone to the working class.

                it happened with the antitrust act, it happened with the New Deal, and it happened in the 1960s with the Civil Rights era and the end to Vietnam

                yes, capitalism will eat itself. it’s what we’re essentially seeing right now in slow motion. but there is something there in democracy beyond just capitalism. even if it’s buried deep down and impotent

                • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  it happened with the antitrust act, it happened with the New Deal, and it happened in the 1960s with the Civil Rights era and the end to Vietnam

                  The thing that ties all of these exceptions together is the immediate threat of ideologically organized revolutionary cadres mobilizing the masses into a socialist revolution

      • abbadon420@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s the advantage of the 2 party system. There is no other way out except revolution. In most European countries there is still an irrational but valid hope for regular reform through regular political means. Those countries are fated to linger on like this a little longer.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Worse: Congress purposely intended for the president to not have direct control over the economy.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Right, but the administration’s actions typically get attributed to the president, plus the president does have a measure of control through executive orders, or proposals which get carried through the house and Senate. The president will obviously sign any initiative that they themselves proposed.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I love how Economy is a high priority, yet they voted for the asshole known being the genius behind several bankruptcies. “The economy isn’t doing good, clearly we need someone who can fuck shit up to make it work!”

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Unironically, I think that was the thought process.

      Hard to vote for someone who is telling you all is well and the people that got the country here are competent and mean well, when the country is going through 5 different crises, all preventing you from living a decent life.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          12 hours ago

          She didn’t have to defend it. This was an election to run over Biden until he was just a pile of goo. She could have came out with some strong contrasting policies, instead she gave some great sound bytes for Trump.

          • djsoren19@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It was such an easy lay-up to fumble. Hell, she raised millions in personal donations compared to a Trump campaign that ended up stiffing locations on payment because they’re so broke, it was the rare election where the Dems didn’t need their corporate donors. They could have accepted some long-term financial losses in the face of potential greater long-term gains if they could maintain similar levels of personal donations from energized progressives. I remember the energy in the air when Harris/Walz was revealed, it seemed like a progressive ticket could seriously exist.

            And then it all vanished. Thanks for taking my $20, assholes. Wouldn’t have bothered if I knew they’d just dance to their owners demands anyway.

            • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 minutes ago

              Fumbling what should have been a cupcake question to talk about a major campaign promise is inexcusable.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s simple, and history has borne this out many many times.

    In a bad economy, no one cares about your politics if you’re the candidate of change. There’s a reason why Harris spent two months repeating memes instead of defending Biden’s policies, because it’s impossible to defend the fact that you had four years to rule and there are more people working 2-3 jobs just to survive.

    They knew they needed to appeal to workers. Instead, they spent most of the campaign repeating this meaningless platitude about joy to people who are being worked to death.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      In a bad economy, no one cares about your politics

      That’s no excuse for electing someone whose stated policies and politics will fuck the economy even further and faster.

      • jdnewmil@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Sure it is, if you don’t understand economics, which few Merkins do. The evidence is right in front of us.

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Also, there were plenty of people who were never going to vote for a woman, no matter what.

      • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I’m sure that’s true too, but that’s not the reason she lost, and Democrats will continue to stack losses if that’s the narrative that they go with.

        Democrats haven’t been ceding male voters to Republicans for 16 years because they hate women. It’s because, in the liberal and activist communities, it’s become customary and accepted to treat men like shit.

        • Revan343@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Democrats will continue to stack losses if that’s the narrative that they go with

          $20 says that or race is the narrative they go with.

        • kava@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s because, in the liberal and activist communities, it’s become customary and accepted to treat men like shit.

          this is just as dumb as the opposite “they didn’t vote for Kamala because she’s a woman”

          people don’t like Kamala because she’s an extension of Joe Biden and Biden has been a failure. that’s why she lost. she offered status quo when people want change. the DNC is incapable of changing quick enough to avoid fascism

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Plenty of people will also never vote for a black man, but that worked spectacularly for the Democrats the first time.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        If that’s why Kamala lost, then explain why Tammy Baldwin is winning Wisconsin and Elissa Slotkin is winning in Michigan.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Then maybe don’t force a woman onto the ballot in “the most important election of our lifetime”. I’m all for progress, but you don’t win elections by forcing ideals upon people who won’t have them, and if this was truly the most important election of our lifetime, then the Democrats should have fielded their most appealing candidate.

        • the post of tom joad@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Yeah if the DNC really gave as much credence to the vote power of racism and misogyny as they do when complaining about election losses, then why would they deliberately step on that landmine by selecting kamala only 8 years after HRC? It’s not like we think idealistic dreamers run the DNC right? That’s silly.

          Why did Dems lose the Senate? Keep the house? Cuz its more than just Harris here… What we’re seeing is voter repudiation of the last 4 years.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Healthcare: 8%

    That explains why americans in America are provided with less(no at all) healthcare than american tourisis in fucking Russia.

    • uis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      This is what happens if any foreigner for example breaks bone in Russia:

      1. Emergency, including emergency specialized, medical care is provided to foreign citizens in case of sickness, accident, trauma, poisining and other cases requireing emergency treatment. Such medical treatment provided by state and municipal healthcare organizations is free of charge.
      • rarbg@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Specifically, state and municipal? Is there some other form of healthcare organization that can provide medical treatment?