• FridaySteve@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 个月前

    Go read your Bible and tell me what it says about using God’s word for frivolous purposes like advancing your ridiculous homophobic agenda. Don’t reply until you’ve done so.

        • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.ukBanned from community
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 个月前

          So, making baseless claims. Maybe you’re that strawman the atheists talk about since you seem to believe in things without evidence

              • FridaySteve@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 个月前

                You keep asking those leading questions, champ. I’ll keep telling you to go away. That’s what we’re doing this morning.

                Keep in mind that Charlie Kirk style question-asking rhetorical style is characteristic of vapid modern right wing thought and not much else. You tell on yourself when you do this.

                • HM King Charles III DG FD@feddit.ukBanned from community
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 个月前

                  What? In order to debate something we have to agree on the definition of terminology first. People used to wrongfully define homosexual as synonymous with “paedophile”. So if I went back to the 1950s where that term was being wrongfully used, a “homophobe” would theoretically be simply someone against paedophilia in their eyes. Which isn’t a bad thing. There are different definitions of homophobe throughout history. How would you define it?