The best part of the fediverse is that anyone can run their own server. The downside of this is that anyone can easily create hordes of fake accounts, as I will now demonstrate.

Fighting fake accounts is hard and most implementations do not currently have an effective way of filtering out fake accounts. I’m sure that the developers will step in if this becomes a bigger problem. Until then, remember that votes are just a number.

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    The lack of karma helps some. There’s no point in trying to rack up the most points for your account(s), which is a good thing. Why waste time on the lamest internet game when you can engage in conversation with folks on lemmy instead.

      • danc4498@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is the problem. All the algorithms are based on the upvote count. Bad actors will abuse this.

            • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              So, the question becomes how do we rank posts and comments in a way that is not based on either upvotes or down votes or number of comments? I could see a trust value being made for each user based on trusted users marking others as trusted combined with a personal trust score, but that puts a barrier on new users and enforces echo chambers.

              What else could be tried?

              • TheOnlyMego@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                that puts a barrier on new users and enforces echo chambers

                Only if trust starts at 0. A system where trust started high enough to not filter out posts and comments would avoid that issue.

              • danc4498@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maybe instances should be assigned a rank for how dependable they are. Length of time active, number of active users… Stuff like that and each instance keeps track of its own rankings for each instance it is federated with. Put the upvote and those stats in a magic box to calculate the actual upvote value.

        • hawkwind@lemmy.management
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Agree. Farming karma is nothing compared to making a single individual polar-opinion APPEAR as though it is other’s (or most’s) polar-opinion. We know that other’s opinions are not our own, but they do influence our opinions. It’s pretty important that either 1) like numbers mean nothing, in which case hot/active/etc. are meaningless or 2) we work together to ensure trust in like numbers.

    • Steve@compuverse.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe you move public perception of a product or political goal.
      To push a narrative of some kind. Astroturfing basically.

    • Muddybulldog@mylemmy.win
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lack of karma is a fallacy. The default Lemmy UI doesn’t display it but the karma system appears to be fully built.

        • Derproid@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was actually talking to someone that works in advertising and for big companies this is unlikely. Pepsi for example pays a lot for the guarntee that their product ads won’t appear near posts they don’t want them to. Since Lemmy advertising would only be through regular posts where they have no control over this, they likely wouldn’t risk the potential detriment to brand perception.

          Now this can change if the potential reach of Lemmy is big enough but that size will be different for each company.

          • cakeistheanswer@lemmy.fmhy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Probably true. it’s the agencies who are desperate and likely to be looking to chatGPT to outsource ad copy who are going to be looking to capitalize.

            No community is really above being targeted, because the good campaigns done by people in the niche tend to be indistinguishable from good posts.

          • Derproid@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is exactly why they wouldn’t risk officially advertising here. Not enough control over the platform leads to too much risk to brand perception.

    • reallynotnick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe I’m misunderstanding karma, but Memmy appears to show the total upvotes I’ve gotten for comments and posts, isn’t that basically karma?

      • influence1123@psychedelia.ink
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think other people can see it though. On Reddit bot accounts would rack up karma so that when they switch to posting spam it looks like they have a lot of karma and are someone who posts worthwhile things.

      • Someology@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        EDIT I was wrong! Lemmy does have karma, even listed in the API, though for some reason it doesn’t show this to you itself. So, those of us just using Lemmy directly have been under the mistaken idea that it didn’t do it, and those using third party apps are seeing it: https://lemmy.world/post/1250922?scrollToComments=true

        ~~That’s interesting, because on the Lemmy website, there is no total upvotes number visible. It only shows the total number of posts and total number of comments. It then shows the list of posts and comments, and you can see the scores for each, but there’s no total. Memmy must be calculating this itself. This seems to be something third party app developers are adding which is not present in actual Lemmy itself, in order to try to replicate Reddit Karma somewhat.

        As Lemmy works itself: On Reddit, in addition to your posts and comments having visible scores, your username also has an aggregate score, which Lemmy does not have. At least, when I go to your profile, I can see the scores for your posts and comments, but I cannot see any aggregate score for you as a user. That’s what Reddit Karma is. I don’t know what black magic formula Reddit calculates it from, as old Reddit and new Reddit show different Karma numbers for the same user, but whatever algorithm they use, it’s an overall user score that Lemmy does not have (so far, at least). ~~

    • Ciryamo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The lack of karma also makes it worse. Usually if I saw a discussion that felt kinda off I’d check the accounts age and karma. Made it easier to sniff out bots.

    • really@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The karma though is what drove Reddit adoption to an extent. Gamification helps. It helped Reddit, it helped robinhood stocks app.

      Maybe fediverse needs some gamification.

      Or maybe not. Facebook and YouTube seem to be doing fine just using the line/unlike button.