• dirthawker0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    160
    ·
    7 months ago

    Mike Johnson said “I personally have real reservations about doing this [expulsion], I’m concerned about a precedent that may be set for that.” Yes, let’s NOT set a precedent of holding politicians accountable for lies, fraud, and theft!

    It should be pretty easy to find the list of everyone else who voted not to expel, so we know who is pro-corruption.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 months ago

        Congress did an internal investigation and determined he likely broke the law. There you go.

        This is just like any other workplace.

        • rhythmicotter@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          7 months ago

          The bar for losing your job as a congress person or any public servant for corruption should be way lower than the bar for being sent to prison.

      • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        He said this well after the Ethics Committee released its findings. Santos was effectively shown to be guilty.

        In the previous attempts at expulsion, a lot of people voted against simply because the report wasn’t out yet. It would have set a dangerous precedent to vote to expel someone without proof of wrongdoing.

      • hglman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        He literally was just convicted in a trial by his peers. His explosion is exactly the basis for common law including many of the points of the magna carta.