NegativeNull@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 11 months ago“Is Fish Meat?” One Justice’s Answer Shows Why the Supreme Court Is So Broken.slate.comexternal-linkmessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1363arrow-down117
arrow-up1346arrow-down1external-link“Is Fish Meat?” One Justice’s Answer Shows Why the Supreme Court Is So Broken.slate.comNegativeNull@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-squaresomeguy3@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-211 months agoIt’s not about Scalia, it’s explaining the concept of justices making rulings based on their own identity and beliefs instead of facts and logic. To, you know, explain “All the current shit going on with the SC”.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·11 months agoBribery, corrruption, and buying court decisions are the issues of today. Personal identity and beliefs don’t factor in when its already bought and paid for.
minus-squaresomeguy3@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoPoints to Roe v wade, EPA “major decisions”, etc.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoBought and paid for. These SC justices are employees of the people that bribe them.
minus-squaresomeguy3@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoBribery in many forms exists, but they are making decisions based on their identity. Something tells me you didn’t read the article, you should.
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·11 months agoScallia may have, but it got him killed in the end.
minus-squareZippy@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoIf they have to go back 7 years to being up an example, that would indicate it is very rare they use only their identity to determine rulings. I don’t doubt they often ignore science but this article indicates that is not the case. Is there not something recent they could refer to?
It’s not about Scalia, it’s explaining the concept of justices making rulings based on their own identity and beliefs instead of facts and logic. To, you know, explain “All the current shit going on with the SC”.
Bribery, corrruption, and buying court decisions are the issues of today.
Personal identity and beliefs don’t factor in when its already bought and paid for.
Points to Roe v wade, EPA “major decisions”, etc.
Bought and paid for.
These SC justices are employees of the people that bribe them.
Bribery in many forms exists, but they are making decisions based on their identity. Something tells me you didn’t read the article, you should.
Scallia may have, but it got him killed in the end.
If they have to go back 7 years to being up an example, that would indicate it is very rare they use only their identity to determine rulings.
I don’t doubt they often ignore science but this article indicates that is not the case. Is there not something recent they could refer to?