• PLAVAT🧿S@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Yeah, I just don’t see the comparison the OP made here. I’m willing to relent that Britain has done more harm than good to India but I’m no expert so I’d defer to someone smarter here.

    But the even crazier thing is that the article isn’t even talking about famine caused by the British Raj… No, they’re saying Churchill was the aggressor and Hitler was pushed into a fight he didn’t want. And the craziest part is the statement that the concentration camps were mercy kills to prevent starvation.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well, they’re Republicans. Those Pollacks were just dressing too slutty. Hitler had to invade. And France? Come on now.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Hitler, famously didn’t want fights that Adolf hitler. The poles were taunting him, just like the French, the Russians, the communists, his own party…