Summary

Donations to Kamala Harris’ campaign are now partially directed to a “Recount Account,” raising speculation about a possible recount effort despite her recent concession to Donald Trump, who won with 312 Electoral College votes.

Although recounts in close states could be requested, Harris’ campaign has emphasized funding efforts to support close Senate and House races still undecided.

The campaign’s website urges donations to help “see the election across the finish line” for Democrats in Congress, while Republicans have already secured a Senate majority and the House remains in contention.

  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    The Democratic party has an unstable coalition at its very core because many people (in their coalition even) believe in white supremacy, have homophobic/transphobic tendencies, or believe in the subjugation of women. They have run consistently after Reagan with a center-right economic platform, but a more left-wing social/cultural platform. When people were marginalized enough by the capital class by their identities this worked as a voting block.

    Now everyone has gotten comfortable enough – because many of the systemic barriers that repressed them have been removed – to believe the superficial lies that Trump isn’t racist, or sexist, or <<insert bad characteristic here>> and it doesn’t motivate them enough to vote anymore.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      The Democratic party has an unstable coalition at its very core

      So do the Republicans, evangelical christians want a police state that subjugates people, while libertarians want barely any state at all. Project 2025 is a messy mishmash of conflicting policy ideas exactly because of this.

      Trump was successful in distancing himself from endorsing any of the conflicting points in the Republican base, Harris went into pleasing the neoliberals hard while very visibly shunning progressives and socialists. The result can be seen by all.

      The point is, Trump ran a better campaign in a political sense than Harris, inasmuch he didn’t distance himself from part of his electorate as Harris did.

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Trump was successful in distancing himself from endorsing any of the conflicting points in the Republican base, Harris went into pleasing the neoliberals hard while very visibly shunning progressives and socialists. The result can be seen by all.

        I understand that’s the narrative but the reality is that socialism is a nothing, nowhere movement in this country and progressivism is as well. There are not millions upon millions of people who will vote for a candidate that passes the purity tests that online leftists apply daily.

        Ultimately, I think the only way out of this hole in this country is a giant labor movement again. That’s what sorts the people into categories for policies. Do you work or do you own a company for a living? The owners and the “tolerant” billionaires need to be jettisoned from the coalition. But there’s a problem there that has prevented them from doing that up until now and it’s that giant piles of money have been necessary to win previous elections. The tolerant billionaires and millionaires were the ones providing that funding.

        I personally think that Republican propaganda could be much less effective if people were aligned with unions that were actually making a difference in their lives. Nowadays, so few people belong to a union that they’re largely irrelevant.

        But it was a bloody battle last time, and I’m not sure it’ll be any easier this time.