What an utter piece of shit.

  • dimath@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    Evidence of what? I don’t know what was the agreement between Musk and US military, but I’m sure if Musk violated it he’ll be liable for it.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        ITAR look it up. Starlink cannot be used in military applications if it’s being used in a commercial application. Musk didn’t pull the plug on this, lawyers and the laws did. I don’t care for the guy either but get your facts straight before believing what CNNs CEOs book tells you.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Do you have any actual evidence that Isaacson, in his authorized biography of Musk, is lying? Wouldn’t Musk have something to say about that since he authorized the biography? Has he denied it? He’s pretty quick to tweet all sorts of other things.

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            That tweet you posted to another person is literally that, ITAR. I’m guessing you still haven’t even looked into what it is.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Please explain why the DoD negotiated a contract to use Starlink in Ukraine if the Ukrainians couldn’t use it in a military capacity.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                They specifically used it for civilian applications and communications. ITAR specifically forbids a company to allow their commercial products while they are supplying a service to be used in a military capacity.

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Because the DoD is using different panels. They’re not using off the shelf stuff. This is normal for the military. Think of it like the hmmvws. Civ hummer is not designed to do anything the military one is. Completely different applicantions.