• floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Raw milk is also an active transmission vector for bird flu, which has a mortality rate, by some measures, of about 51%. COVID was about 1 or 2%.

    • saigot@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      there’s also a big difference between drinking minutes old raw milk directly straight out of the teet, vs commercial operations where the milk is a few hours to days old and is bottled with equipment that isn’t perfectly cleaned between each bottle and then consumers sticking it in a fridge for a week. The former is just something farmers are going to do if they want and isn’t really a serious public health concern imo (although still not without risk) and can’t really be regulated away anyway. the latter exposes way more people and is way more dangerous, and that IS able to be regulated out of existence.

    • dumples@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It takes time for the microbes in raw milk to grow to become dangerous. So drinking it on your own farm with your own cow isn’t an issue since there is no time for them to grow. Any processing adds time which gives bacteria more time to grow. For a reference, in ideal conditions E. coli can double its population every 20 minutes.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Although this is anecdotal evidence I think you have a few good points. I’d be willing to let the practice be more common as long as the product stayed local (within the county) and the cows were kept in specific conditions (not shoulder to shoulder 24/7). The data regarding this is very small so I wouldn’t want stuff to start being transported hundreds of miles until there’s some kind of established safety record.