Jacob Chansley, sentenced to three years for his role in the Capitol riots, will run as a libertarian in Arizona.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No. He’s ex-military, 14th amendment applies.

      No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same…

      He took an oath as a member of the military, he also took part in insurrection.

      From the court documents:

      The crimes charged in the indictment involve active participation in an insurrection attempting to violently overthrow the United States Government. By Chansley’s own admissions to the FBI and news media, the insurrection is still in progress and he intends to continue participating.

      • TechyDad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        You and I might agree that it applies, but how much do you want to bet that some Trump appointed judges decide that it doesn’t apply and kill any effort to remove him from the ballot?

      • mateomaui@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ya’ll keep saying these things like I don’t already know, but regardless of what the 14th amendment says, or his military background, ultimately that determination will be made by a court decision, because if nothing else he will sue the state if they choose to take him off the ballot. I didn’t make the rules, or the legal system.

          • Drusas@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It will probably ultimately depend on whether or not the Supreme Court decides to uphold the 14th amendment of the Constitution. The lower courts are slowly working their way towards bringing that question to the Supreme Court as it relates to Trump.

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can you point out exactly what makes him ineligible? Even if everyone agreed that it was an insurrection, point out where it would bar him.

        • TheaoneAndOnly27@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You bring up an interesting point, and I’ll admit I am not a constitutional lawyer. But section 3 of the 14th amendment says that hey couldn’t have sworn to uphold the Constitution prior to attempting insurrection. Thats how they are framing it for Trump too because he swore to uphold the Constitution when he came into office. I don’t know if Chansley had done the same or if that would make a difference.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Can’t work from home when that home is a federal prison.

          He was sentenced for 3 years. (Which is a joke, but that’s besides the point.)

          And he’s ex military which means the 14th applies

    • meeeeetch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      While obviously Chansley deserves to face punishment for his crimes, let’s not pretend that it wasn’t an obscenity that Eugene Debs had to run for office from prison for suggesting that the US had no business throwing lives away in the trenches of World War I