• foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is at this moment I would like to remind everyone that 100 is the average IQ, which necessarily means that half of the people that walk among us are rocking double digit IQs.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not necessarily half. There could be a group that is a fair bit less than half, but are so dumb they throw the averages off.

      • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        No, 100 is the median IQ, but that doesn’t preclude there being a lot of people with exactly 100 IQ. Thus there would be less than half of the population below 100 (and also less than half above 100).

          • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            That quote from Carlin is one that often comes to mind, LOL.

            It’s alarming to learn how accurate that actually is. People often talk about how comedians are basically today’s philosophers and I can understand why.

            The measurements on numeracy and literacy in the United States explains quite a bit about one’s everyday experience. I mean, I went to university and graduated. I got mostly A’s in K-12. I was not valedictorian. I did not have a 4.0 in university. I don’t have a PhD. I consider myself someone with about average intelligence, but I applied myself. I read rather widely. I try to apply logic to situations and assess new material as it comes in.

            I don’t think this is some high bar for an adult. Honestly, I consider the above the bare minimum. Often it felt like I was coasting in high school and parts of university.

            But everyday experiences and seeing how other adults behave and what they believe and accept as “fact” seems to constitute a baffling array of the ridiculous and the silly. When you remember things like this, it makes a bit more sense:

            https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/survey-of-adults-skills-2023-country-notes_ab4f6b8c-en/united-states_427d6aac-en.html

      • teyrnon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Gtfo 100? Huh, I would have thought it would be higher, the intelligence quotient test does no such thing as measure intelligence however. They’re logic tests, and if you practice logic tests you get better at them, intelligence is the ability to learn, smarts is your compiled knowledge. If anything this IQ test measures your smarts.

        That said people are dumb as shit for many reasons.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Despite the other person suggesting it is ‘higher now’, nope.

          It is by definition 100. (Mean not median as incorrectly suggested by me earlier. Those correction are valid and welcome.)

          But yes. 100.

          A lot of responses to my post have a lot of armchair this and that so I haven’t interacted with them.

          https://www.pearsonassessments.com/content/dam/school/global/clinical/us/assets/featured-topics/assessment-primer-whitepaper.pdf

          See for yourself. (Page 3-4)

          Scores are adjusted such that the median is ALWAYS 100. That’s how we do IQ. Every response to my previous post ignoring this and arguing otherwise should just be outright ignored.

          Ugh sorry. It’s them not you lol.

          It is by definition that the average IQ is 100. I responded to you and not them because you weren’t pretentious about getting new information. 🍻

      • ReluctantlyZen@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sure, but the poll itself is already dumb. Why poll opinions on a fact? It implies there’s any actual value or some truth to this.

        • orclev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Something can be a fact and a belief at the same time. E.G. some people believe the moon landing was faked or that the Earth is flat. It’s a fact that the cost of living was lower under Biden yet some people believe that it’s lower under Trump. Those people are just as crazy as the flat Earthers, and yet they still exist. The real concerning thing is how many of them there are though. The fact that it’s not something like 1% or fewer that believes Trump is better is really concerning but sadly not surprising. Your average Trump supporter is really dumb and ignorant.

            • orclev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Because if 40% of people believed the Earth was flat you’d probably want to know that. It shows what a disturbingly large chunk of the US is just straight delusional and to a certain extent how we got into this situation in the first place. Decades after decades of propaganda and the constant stream of bullshit from places like Fox News and then Facebook has reduced a significant chunk of the US population into idiots that are literally incapable of just observing reality and coming to a reasonable conclusion.

        • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because for some people it can be cheaper, especially if they moved. So, the poll sheds light on for how many people are their lives more or less expensive even if on average we know most prices went up for most products.

        • arrow74@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Because very often people vote based on how they feel and that does not always align with the facts

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Because they infer a lot about how people will vote. It is an election after all.

        In short, we can demonstrate that something is a fact, but if greater than 50% of the population doesn’t believe it then not much can come of it. Feelings don’t change facts, but they do change how people act upon facts

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Umm no? It does describe how propaganda can work, but people can be influenced in many ways. Asking them how they feel on a topic is not propaganda. Based on the results you can analyze and argue that people are being influenced by propaganda