• WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 months ago

    Except when the terms of what an official act is not defined, the Supreme Court gets to decide, after the fact.

    • firebyte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve been thinking about this a bit, I’m not sure it’s been considered and I may be going out on a random tangent…

      Isn’t this whole ‘immunity’ decision just another power grab, or rather further cementing of their power, by SCOTUS? Think about it. They’re essentially the arbiter of ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ now, as there’s no further avenue of appeal save for amending the U.S. Constitution.

      Put aside the vagueness of ‘official’ vs. ‘unofficial’ acts for a moment.

      • Trump did something definitely illegal, and Trump argues was ‘official’, like his classified records case. Immune.

      • Biden did something questionably legal yet unofficial, such as forgetfully retaining classified documents after his tenure as VP (which he immediately returned). Supreme Court decides ‘not immune’, and some idiot decides to prosecute.

      Trump might end up as a king, but the conservative majority of SCOTUS are the kingmakers and protectors.

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Eh. Not if Biden just says “no. Fuck you. That was an official act.” And then just categorically ignore the court. Which is precisely what Trump would do if presented with a mirrored version of the situation.

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        In the mirror situation, Trump would’ve just had the opposing court justices assassinated and then installed puppets that would rule that those assassinations were official acts.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      So he can limit the scope of what the next president can do simply by using the power he’s been given.

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nope because he can’t interpret nor create laws. Just break them. The next president is free to do as they wish.

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          And if he breaks them, the Supreme Court will rule that the president can’t do whatever it is that Biden did. Assuming whatever Biden did doesn’t result in the court having a different makeup.