I guess what they’re trying to say is “We do not endorse this candidate, she doesn’t represent our views, but you need to vote for her anyway because that’s the only choice that will prevent a far worse outcome.”
But if that’s so, I feel like they probably should have just said it, instead of dancing around the point like this.
Particularly because some will take that to mean they should vote third party, which given how our shitty electoral system works, is essentially just a vote for Trump in terms of the end result.
That’s just endorsing Harris with extra steps.
I guess what they’re trying to say is “We do not endorse this candidate, she doesn’t represent our views, but you need to vote for her anyway because that’s the only choice that will prevent a far worse outcome.”
But if that’s so, I feel like they probably should have just said it, instead of dancing around the point like this.
As if this isn’t the shit people have been trying to tell them for months now…
Particularly because some will take that to mean they should vote third party, which given how our shitty electoral system works, is essentially just a vote for Trump in terms of the end result.
But mah integriteh!!! Mah principals!!!
We endorsed Harris with a Venn Diagram.
Sometimes it’s more about the journey than the destination
Best comment