Ok guys, so now I’m confused. Everyone here has been telling me that Trump and Harris are both the same with regards to Israel’s genocide? So surely this person gave to both sides, right?
It’s so transparent. “Listen to the people impacted! Both sides are equally evil!” “Like listen to Uncommitted?” “No! Listen to the people who agree with me!”
Also, even though they are “exactly the same” on this issue, it is illegal to consider other issues. Like Blood Libel against Haitians, whether or not it is okay to do insurrections, whether or not it is okay to execute political opponents as official acts, should we use the military on voters who vote wrong, etc. You aren’t allowed to consider those.
But, but Harris is enabling Genocide Joe! /s
Isn’t the max political donation supposed to be like $1300? I’m not looking to start a discussion about the specific loopholes they’re using to skirt that rule. I’m confident that would only be depressing. I just find it insane that it’s clear enough what is happening that a headline like this can be written without being cause for either a libel suit against the author or criminal campaign finance charges being brought against this billionaire. We’re all just like “yep, that’s where we are now”.
Israel has a special exception.
JFK tried to patch it and was assasinated before it was completed.
In 2010 an unelected group of theocrats decided that the wealthy are allowed to spend as much money as they like on propaganda.
Not for a PAC.
And anyone can set up a PAC. John Oliver did one a few years ago too.
Once you have one of those, you can donate an unlimited amount of money.
Citizens United vs the FEC was the beginning of the end of democracy for America.
Israeli-American billionaire Miriam Adelson has spent $95 million on her political action committee (PAC)
The loophole is in the opening sentence though. We gotta ban pacs (difficulty god mode)
We’re all just like “yep, that’s where we are now”.
Yep… America: land of the fee, home of the billionaire.
A government of the corporation, by the corporation, for the corporation.
:(
ya gotta wonder why one billionaire needs to give money to another ‘billionaire’
Don’t become that rich by spending your own money
To convince the poor that other poors are the problem.
Too late
We’ll see.
Lol, what is this a Brewster’s Millions kinda deal where they see how much campaign cash they can blow through in a week?
They need cash to campaign after the election too, coups don’t organize themselves.
Wow.
Middle East Monitor - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for Middle East Monitor:
MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this sourceSearch topics on Ground.News
