Specifically the ones that post like bots but are not marked as bots.

The accounts that post into all sorts of comms including many they aren’t a member of. The posts are usually pretty low quality and its clear the operator is not curating anything.

I find them annoying so I block. What do you think about it?

  • Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    I don’t block anyone but I do post frequently. I only ever get annoyed when someone is posting the same thing in multiple communities at the same time.

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Only a few obvious bots because they were filling up my feed. I like seeing posts from users, especially when it comes to news.

  • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, not consciously. However, I do block accounts that reply to me in a shitty or condescending way. Life’s too short to deal with these people and I’ll never meet them in real life. I’ve wasted far too much time engaging with arseholes over on Reddit, but since I’ve moved here I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the civility of most discourse. So that’s why I block anyone wrecking my experience.

  • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s that one guy who keeps making accounts with the same cm00* username but different servers. I wish piefed/blorp could block accounts based on a regex , wildcard, or other filter.

    • cm0002@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Context

      Why am I cross-posting .ml content?

      I cross-post from .ml to the nearest relevant non-.ml comm to reduce the influence of .ml comms and indirectly, the instance as a whole, to help vitilize non-.ml comms and make it an easier decision for other instance admins to defederate because one key reason I identified that admins don’t want to defederate is because .ml still has some very large comms and some active niche comms.

      Megathread on the issue

      Some highlights from the link:

      Dessalines, head .ml admin, lead Lemmy dev actively spreading genocide denialism https://sh.itjust.works/post/61371958

      .ml admin, Nutomics continued transphobia https://lemmy.world/post/29222558 The original transphobic Comment from Nutomic: https://lemmy.world/post/18236068

      “If you don’t support Russia then you just don’t understand geopolitics” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

      "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/30580167

      “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” ~ Davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/30673342

      “NK is actually good and anything counter to that is Western propaganda!” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/31595035

      General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet ~davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

      And so so much documentation on clear heavy handed censorship and bias also on the link. So much I can’t even put them all here because this comment would be really long.

      I believe the behavior of its admins (the main admins are Lemmy devs) does harm to the overall growth of the Lemmy-verse and maybe even the Thrediverse (since Lemmy kinda kicked off the Thrediverse) because of its association with the devs of Lemmy and their insistence to use .ml as their personal political platform to spread harmful propaganda

      On the outside, bringing up Lemmy frequently leads to comments like “Lemmy? Isn’t that the place with a bunch of tankies?” Or “Tried Lemmy, but found it full of pro Russia crap so I left”. The best way forward from that I see is to either widely defederate from .ml like the rest of the Triad, or pressure them to put a fair and unbiased as possible admin team.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Beep is another one like that. I don’t block them specifically so I can call out their art theft, because they feed people’s comics to AI to remove the watermark.

    • Hirohito@fedinsfw.appOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes and this operator does not seem to even read the content they repost. After they posted very low quality misleading items a few times, I blocked all of their accounts.

      • cm0002@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I review each and every crosspost since it’s all done manually, I only filter out propaganda (like the constant deluge of Russian propaganda on .ml) and spams/scams

        Obviously I’m human so I make mistakes, it happens, but the point is you can have the freedom to actually call out and/or discuss such things on another instance without needing to worry about getting censored and/or banned by the .ml admin for doing so

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m pretty sure that they specifically repost things posted from .ml accounts. They aren’t looking at the posts or hoping to farm “karma” or whatever, they’re trying to de-populate the instance.

        Can be pretty annoying when all the .ml posts line up with the cm00* posts.

        • cm0002@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yea that’s right

          Why am I cross-posting .ml content?

          I cross-post from .ml to the nearest relevant non-.ml comm to reduce the influence of .ml comms and indirectly, the instance as a whole, to help vitilize non-.ml comms and make it an easier decision for other instance admins to defederate because one key reason I identified that admins don’t want to defederate is because .ml still has some very large comms and some active niche comms.

          Megathread on the issue

          Some highlights from the link:

          Dessalines, head .ml admin, lead Lemmy dev actively spreading genocide denialism https://sh.itjust.works/post/61371958

          .ml admin, Nutomics continued transphobia https://lemmy.world/post/29222558 The original transphobic Comment from Nutomic: https://lemmy.world/post/18236068

          “If you don’t support Russia then you just don’t understand geopolitics” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/27352415

          "Don’t worry guys, the Uyghur Genocide was REALLY just birth control! ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/30580167

          “See! nobody died IN Tiananmen Square, just AROUND it, so it doesn’t count!!” ~ Davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/30673342

          “NK is actually good and anything counter to that is Western propaganda!” ~dessalines, .ml admin, dev https://lemmy.world/post/31595035

          General negative sentiment to other instances who haven’t “seen the way” yet ~davel, .ml admin https://lemmy.world/post/27426510

          And so so much documentation on clear heavy handed censorship and bias also on the link. So much I can’t even put them all here because this comment would be really long.

          I believe the behavior of its admins (the main admins are Lemmy devs) does harm to the overall growth of the Lemmy-verse and maybe even the Thrediverse (since Lemmy kinda kicked off the Thrediverse) because of its association with the devs of Lemmy and their insistence to use .ml as their personal political platform to spread harmful propaganda

          On the outside, bringing up Lemmy frequently leads to comments like “Lemmy? Isn’t that the place with a bunch of tankies?” Or “Tried Lemmy, but found it full of pro Russia crap so I left”. The best way forward from that I see is to either widely defederate from .ml like the rest of the Triad, or pressure them to put a fair and unbiased as possible admin team.

          You could always just block .ml :)

          • papalonian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I could, but for the very reasons you cite instances don’t defederate from them, I don’t. I block individuals that post bullshit I don’t like, but my feed is already small as it is without purging a sizable amount of it.

            • cm0002@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Fair, but I can tell you that a lot of .ml comms only appear to be very large because they’re one of the original instances so their comm subscriber counts are quite bloated with dead and deleted accounts (I don’t think subscriber counts decrease for any reason other than you actually clicking the unsubscribe button on a comm)

              If you take a look by MAUs (a much better metric to go by) the non.ml Threadiverse is actually very healthy

              https://lemmyverse.net/communities?order=active_month

              • papalonian@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                My decision isn’t based on metrics, just by how many .ml posts/comments I see that I know I wouldn’t if I’d blocked the instance. I know a lot of crap comes from them, and I don’t doubt they’re problematic, but for the most part, the shitty posts and comments from them are down voted to hell so I never see them, or are from users I’ve already blocked.

        • Hirohito@fedinsfw.appOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Yes, the operator is very public about their goals. This doesn’t make it any less annoying and by all measures it is not having the desired effect. I like that I can just block and make it all disappear.

          • cm0002@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            It’s absolutely having the desired effects, when I started I was needing to sift through 100-200 posts every morning when I start

            Now its down to 30-40 and select comms I monitor increase in MAUs

  • DeepDown@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yep. I’m not trying to see somebody just showing me the top 50 posts off their reddit feed day after day after day. That shit sure does numbers here though.

    Ever had that reddit friend IRL who’s just always showing you reddit stuff you already saw? That’s who those are. They don’t comment, they don’t post oc, they never mix up their posts, it’s a bot. Straight to the block bin.

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    I block posters and commenters I don’t want to see. Its that simple.

    I used to avoid it because I thought I’d create an echochamber, but I’ve come to realise that there’s a few users with fixations about specific issues that just give me the shits honestly.

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Someone once told me that blocking people to curate your feed was a valid use case and I’ve never looked back. I don’t care too much about an echo chamber if I am removing people who are absolutely unhinged.

      • papalonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        But how would you feel if a financially stable, but socially flawed, middle aged woman from the South, were to date a moderately financially stable, but socially accepted, young man from Singapore? What are your thoughts on that?

  • Baaron87@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    For the most part…no, I don’t. I’m still of the mindset that there’s not enough people posting across communities, so blocking accounts is an absolutely last resort for me personally.

    That said, there is one account that I know of that I question if it’s really a person or a bot. I won’t say who. However, they post multiple times an hour across a lot of communities. (I even went to their profile once to see when there would be a sizable break/gap for when they should be sleeping and didn’t find a gap within a 24 hour window!) I actually removed myself from one community because the posting there became way too frequent. Elsewhere that same account posts relevant content, so that was a better balance for me.

    TL;DR - Usually no, so long as they’re posting what I consider acceptable/decent quality content. I’m more likely to remove myself from one community than block an account to tone down the level of posts in my subscribed feed.

    I definitely understand finding it annoying though.

    Also, welcome to Lemmy!

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think I blocked a couple of accounts years ago that were just reposting ancient memes from reddit in bot-like numbers. But it seems like the majority of content here falls under that category, so blocking seems futile. Can’t even use downvoting to correct the issue because our votes aren’t private/anonymous here and I don’t need a large account seeing that I downvote their content every time I come across it. It would have to feel personal at that point 😆

    I don’t mind big accounts in principle, I just don’t want to see memes from 2018 being reposted every day with the same titles, and for there to be no other content from those accounts.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Can’t even use downvoting to correct the issue because our votes aren’t private/anonymous here and I don’t need a large account seeing that I downvote their content every time I come across it. It would have to feel personal at that point

      Downvote away, who cares if some massive account sees you don’t like their content? Also, who spends that much time checking who does(n’t) like what you post?

      Maybe I’m weird, but I don’t care past a basic up/down count. And even then, I’ve seen some of the shit that gets upvotes in certain comms, I’m not concerned with going against the hive mind on certain topics.