• Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    124
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is relevant to history. You can either tell the Trump story that a bullet hit his ear, or you can say that he caught shrapnel.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      The only way that would be relevant would be if there was a determination that the shooter was trying to do some kind of ad hoc false flag thing, as opposed to writing his own name into history. Everything we know at this point indicates that the latter is true, and the former is not.

      Whether Trump’s injury was the result of a fired projectile or a piece of shrapnel, the injury was caused by an assassination attempt.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        104
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Whether Trump’s injury was the result of a fired projectile or a piece of shrapnel, the injury was caused by an assassination attempt.

        We all know what really happened.

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          54
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A trick he learned back in his WWE guest star days.

          (This is meant as a joke, please do not be upset. I mean no disrespect to WWE fans.)

        • Transporter Room 3@startrek.websiteBanned
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know, it’s funny because the moment I saw the picture where you could see a little blood, I thought to myself “did anyone make sure he didn’t have a ketchup packet in his pockets?”

          And sure enough, I’m never original…

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I thought I was the only one whose first thought was that W wasn’t surprised on 9/11 when I saw the clip of him being informed. Turns out a LOT of people had that thought. 😂

        • ZK686@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          1 year ago

          Reddit 2.0… make fun of Biden… BANNED for LIFE! Make fun of Trump… LOL, He’s SO STUPID!!!

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The truth is still the truth, even if there is no material difference in the implications.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also relevant because one of Trump’s current campaign statements is that he “took a bullet for America” which may be another lie.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          It would certainly neuter that (over)statement, but I honestly wouldn’t go as far as to call that one a “lie” without some indication that he knew that it wasn’t a bullet he was hit by. I don’t think that even a reasonable person wouldn’t come to the conclusion that “Shots were fired, at me, now my ear is bleeding all over my face” as “I was hit by a bullet.”

        • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree.

          The sheer number of lies he tells, what difference is one more? Especially an inconsequential one?

          We’re all fairly sure it wasn’t the bullet, but glass, or shrapnel or whatever, but that buries the lede.

          The point here is whether it was an assassination attempt or a false flag attempt (personally I think assassination) and that trumps own hateful rhetoric has created such a ridiculous scenario where this shit happens.

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Because it’s always important to point out the hypocrisy of his fake patriotic bullshit. Every lie should be pointed out, to everyone who will listen.

            • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              But then you lose the bigger point that his rhetoric and horse shit has lead us here.

              You’re too zoomed in.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        except if the shooter was just shooting into the crowd and hit like a railing or something then it wasn’t an “assassination attempt” it was a mass shooting.

        • Carrolade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Frankly, it could be a mass-shooting anyway, simply one that had a high-profile figure as one of the targets. Apparently he had explosives in his car and some sort of remote detonation mechanism, so it was clearly about more than just Trump alone.

            • Carrolade@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair. None of that speculation is inherently any better than the mass shooting speculation though, there’s similarly zero indication he had anything personal against Trump. He even had potential dem targets in his search history. There’s no sound evidence for anything so far, that I’ve heard at any rate.

              Though I do think it’s a little far-fetched that what appears to be an intelligent engineering student is going to think sneaking over and planting explosives is going to be a viable plan. That’s a little video gamey.

                • Carrolade@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Again, there is also no evidence he specifically wanted Trump dead and was not simply committing a blaze-of-glory act of terrorism for some misguided chance at fame. Having no evidence does not mean we default to one preferred interpretation.

                  Regarding the rooftop, from all indications he carefully scouted his method. The drone, the rangefinder, the ladder, etc. The building was local police’s responsibility, as well, they actually even had a cop inside that very building. Regardless though, it certainly was embarrassing for the SS anyway, hence the director resigning.

        • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The grenade landed 18.6 metres (61 ft) from the podium

          Bush was thrown at by someone who couldn’t throw

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The grenade failed to detonate. Although original reports indicated that the grenade was not live, it was later revealed that it was. After Arutyunian pulled the pin and threw the grenade, it hit a girl, cushioning its impact. The red handkerchief remained wrapped around the grenade, and it prevented the striker lever from releasing.

          No mention of it being “a training grenade [which] could not fire.” Source?

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        ad hoc false flag

        Dont be in such a rush to rule this out lol. Ad hoc false flag should be Trump’s middle names

        He’s always been a real ad war hoc

      • rsuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think there’s essentially no limit to what the shooter’s motives could be. What was the Las Vegas shooter’s motive? What was the motive at Columbine? There’s a million possibilities. Narcissism, delusions, non-specific rage.

        Sure, there’s one conclusion that seems simplest, which is that he shot at Trump but missed. And if he grazed Trump’s ear, that’s almost certainly true. But what if it comes out that the FBI finds that the closest shot was over 10 feet away from Trump? If that happens, I think we’d be fools to continue to assume it was an assassination attempt.

        The smartest thing anyone could say at this point is “I don’t know”.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s still not very relevant. Either way he was shot at and his ear was hit. Whether or not it was a whole bullet, part of a bullet after the bullet hit something, or something that the bullet busted off that hit his ear is of minimal importance.