• Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    7 days ago

    What a frivolous waste of congressional speaking time. I thought these guys had real problems to solve? I thought Trump was gonna fix it all this time around? You’re telling me not even 1 week into his new term and he’s already thinking about how the job won’t be done in time?

    Conservatives are pathetic.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      That’s basically what I’ve been posting on Social Media anytime shit like this happens.

      “How does this lower grocery prices?”

      Ask whenever the Right or Center is listening, keep the message on “Trump is distracting you from what he isn’t doing, but should.”

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Thank you for saying grocery instead of egg. So many people say eggs and it is going to age like milk when the bird flu recedes even though groceries will generally still be expensive otherwise.

    • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      If this fails, you can expect them to redefine what a “term” means. And if that fails they can simply cancel elections under “emergency” conditions and keep him in office for longer.

      … and if that fails, they can just say “too bad” and do whatever they want anyway because who’s going to stop them?

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      I just want to point out that this is just one of the many many campaign promises he is trying to fulfill. Sure, it’s a big deal. But simply saying “conservatives are pathetic” is not only reactionary, it is wrong. Look at what is happening to immigrants. You might not see them as a problem, but conservatives do, and they are “solving” it.

      Just saying, this shit is way scarier this time around. They’re fuckin’ moving.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      On the other hand, better they do nothing than actuality successfully fucking everything up.

      • psud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        The worry is that perhaps Trump is smarter than he appears, and all he’s doing is showing his followers that he’s still all about setting up a autocratic government which they’ll get to be the muscle for, ready to do a violent takeover the moment elections stop working (just like last time, but this time better armed and better organised)

        • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Trump, if anything, is much less smart than he appears. The guy managed to bankrupt a casino. That takes a special kind of stupid.

  • waywardninja@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    From the article:

    Ogles’ resolution is tailored specifically to permit Trump to serve a third term, but not to allow three out of the four living former presidents to serve third terms.

    It’s a Trump only privilege which, given the track record, could have been assumed, unfortunately.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It obviously won’t get close to passing but it would be incredible for Democrats if it did. He has zero margin in the House, nothing major is passing into law except tax cuts. All his executive order policies are inflationary.

    So either he’s crashing the economy, taking the blame for continued inflation, or getting nothing of consequence done. And he’d be 83 and asking for four more years. He’d get crushed.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      We’ve played this game twice now. Let’s not try a third game of fascism chicken

      That said Obama vs trump would be a funny campaign. “My fellow Americans, look at this absolute buffoon. You want proof I’m a natural born citizen? I’ve been stuck here with him too.”

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          And while i think he’d struggle in that scenario I’ve gotten very wary of people (myself included) thinking “he can’t possibly win in this scenario” because that’s twice now been the prelude to defeat. Wheras in 2020 he was taken as a serious threat from the start

        • jj4211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 days ago

          That was one race, and during a pandemic that probably would have lost the race for any incumbent, whether it made logical sense or not.

          Frankly I kind of wish he won his second term if he had to get another term at all. His bruised ego over losing, fear of legal consequences, and time away to stew on this have made him a far more dangerous president than last time.

    • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      Of course he will wreck the rather healthy US economy and break the unemployment record again, which he currently holds from his 1st term.

  • HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    To amend the United States Constitution, a proposed amendment must be approved by Congress and ratified by three-fourths of the states. The process is outlined in Article V of the Constitution.

    Congress: A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required

    Constitutional convention: Two-thirds of state legislatures must call for a convention

    Ratification: Three-fourths of state legislatures or conventions must ratify the amendment

    Each state legislature must vote on the amendment in an up-or-down vote

    State legislatures cannot change the language of the amendment

    This is DOA

    • AgentDalePoopster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Seriously. It’s obviously abhorrent, but thankfully as of now there’s zero chance of it passing. Save your energy for the many things that warrant shock and disgust.

  • htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    7 days ago

    Trump is not exactly a spring chicken. He is one mild medical event to being in the history book.

    • ATDA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      COVID nearly killed him and RFK is antivax sycophant. I’m not a betting man but…

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Great, than we end up with Vance aka the young, healthy, couch-fucking, monarchist who lacks Trump’s compulsive need for worship.

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Vance used to be the face of Never Trump, which makes his actual motives a mystery. The best possibility would rely on him pulling a long con, but so would the worst possibility.

    • TiaNati@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s a really dangerous way of thinking. We can no longer normalize this stuff by going “it’ll never actually happen.” It CAN happen. Get your head out of the sand and stop minimizing the very real threat our democracy is facing.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        What democracy? We’ve been living in a police state our entire lives. Talk about a dangerous way of thinking, ffs, how many hundreds of thousands of people were murdered under the Bush administration alone, and you act like that was just healthy democracy? Why were Bush and Obama on the same page about the erosion of our civil liberties and global imperialism? I swear, some of you are just miles from the correct explanation.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        This one won’t happen though. It doesn’t have the votes. It would require a Constitutional amendment, and thus a LOT of Democrats on board.

        You can’t freak out about every possible thing.

    • psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      And we were all overreacting about Roe v Wade. “Precedent”, “established law”, “checks and balances”. It could never happen, they said.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I really would like to see some of those checks and balances I’ve heard so much about. Must have gotten confused—it’s cheques for the rich, on our dime, to make their balance keeps going up.

    • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Reminder that they control all branches of government and can do whatever the hell they want.

      Even though I partially agree that it’s probably somebody sucking up instead of them passing a “remove all term limits” bill instead.

      Or maybe they’re just testing the waters and compliance of the people currently elected, heck if I know.

  • Clbull@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Knowing Trump, I wouldn’t be surprised if he went full Nayib Bukele and sent in troops to influence the vote.

    And as much as I like Bukele, he presided over unique circumstances where his country was effectively being ruled by MS-13 and his actions were warranted in the case of being elected leader of a country ruled by drug overlords. The USA is going through no such crisis.

  • roofTophopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    God damn. I’ve never seen a group of people lick asshole so hard and ask for seconds. These people box Trump’s tonsils digging that tongue so far in it’s unbelievable

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    Good fucking luck with that hurdle.

    They need a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate; or a conventio called by Congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then it has to be ratified by the legislatures of three-quarters of the states.

    Even if they managed a super majority on both sides of Congress for Trumplefuck, there’s no way they’re getting 38 States to agree to that.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      118
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 days ago

      I don’t think the law is a restricting factor for the trump regime.

    • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      81
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      It’s sad that you guys still think the rule of the constitution is some massive roadblock that they’ve somehow missed. They literally made an Executive Order that just says “No” to the very first sentence of the 14th amendment, do you think none of them noticed? They get to have a vote about ludicrous things, and they get to gleefully destroy the lives of any Republican who dares vote against them. Maybe it gets struck down for the time being? Who cares, the courts are packed, they can realistically just start killing people pretty soon and it’ll start with the disloyals and the true believers as needed as it always does.

      You cannot logical trap nor get off on technicalities fascists. It does not matter to them, they will just do what they want anyways, all that matters is if they can crush anyone who tries to stop them.

      They are pushing the boundaries of the conversation and they are testing the waters, and every time they’re pushed back on they use the limp push back to consolidate more power because nobody has been willing to actually stop them.

      • witten@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        With all due respect, that is some real defeatist dog shit. Yes, Trump and cronies have no respect for the constitution or the rule of law. But if we collectively roll over at the first fascist executive order, that’s exactly what they want us to do… They are testing the waters. The supreme court is packed, but every circuit court in the country certainly isn’t. And that’s where these battles are already being fought. We need to collectively resist every encroachment, every power grab. Otherwise we’re nearly as culpable as Trump for the rise of fascism.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          If you aren’t willing to kill them then they will inch forward until they win. That is why civil wars have existed.

          • witten@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Violence isn’t the only way to fight fascism. It’s surely a way. But the courts and the school districts are two early battle grounds where folks are already pushing back (non-violently) and preventing some of that inching forward.

            • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 days ago

              Preventing some, some of the time, is how you get here, inch by inch, and eventually earlier wins become future losses.

              • witten@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 days ago

                Look at it this way… We have a portfolio of tools to fight fascism. Sometimes, yes, the proper response to a specific incursion is direct action. Sometimes you can accomplish more with other means (fighting back in the courts, etc.). It doesn’t have to be all or nothing, and in fact I’d argue you accomplish the most by picking your tools wisely for each battle.

      • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        There are only two tried and true methods I am aware of to stop fascists:

        1. Killing them
        2. Making them kill themselves

        I’m going to enjoy seeing this comment get removed. I’ll think about it as I’m put on the train to the death camp.

        • Lemming6969@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I think the logic is sound… If anyone is allowed to introduce legislation against established reforms infinitely many times, you get gish galloped to death and they will eventually get their way no matter how terrible the idea is. Because it’s a deep ideology, you must get rid of the person to get rid of the idea.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      Trump is the candidate during next election

      Red States let him be an option even though they shouldn’t

      He wins enough red States to have a majority

      They name him president even though it’s against the Constitution

      The supreme Court is packed with his picks so they don’t do anything about it

      Tada! Civil war? Dissolution of the USA? Who knows!?!

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        This.

        We need to stop acting like the norms matter at all, like the rules still apply. We must treat this like what it is: a threat to our very survival.

        The US government, at least the parts that actually could do something about this, are on the brink of total collapse or dismantlement. I hate to say it but I think the time for peaceful resistance is long since past, i don’t see any way this is going to end without bloodshed

    • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Trump is ruling by executive order and no one is stopping him from doing any of it, constitutional or not.
      He’ll just issue an executive order to lower the threshold and at best that order gets challenged and goes to the SCOTUS, and we all know what will happen there.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        There’s already an injunction against one of his orders. I’m sure more will come.

      • drekloge@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        The only effective short-term roadblocks are going to be legal challenges, like the ones WA’s governor and AG have been preparing for. You’re right that this only works until it gets overturned by SCOTUS, and it doubly hurts progressives because we now have to spend resources (time and money) fighting nonsense instead of fighting for causes we want…like some goddamn healthcare.

        Delay. Deny. Depose.

    • ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s obviously completely performative, this is a very common move in US politics in general, I’ve noticed–introducing a bill they know is definitely not going to pass, but makes them look good to their base.